Plural Number ( Concept )
http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/PluralNumber
Thing |_
Abstract |_
Linguistic Property |_
Morphosyntactic Property |_
Number Property
|_ Plural Number
Definition:
PluralNumber is a number property that quantifies the denotation of the nominal element so that: 1) it specifies that there are more than one. In this English example below, plural is shown by both the noun and the verb in (2):
(1) my dog watches television
(2) my dogs watch television
[Corbett 2000: 5]
2) additionally, but not necessarily, pluralNumber may be assigned on the basis of formal properties (e.g. pluralia tantum, or measles / *measle). 3) if pluralNumber functions as generalNumber, it may specify a lack of commitment with regard to quantification ([Corbett 2000,17] notes this system does not exist in pure form, that is, no language employs it as the normal case).
Some Cushitic languages, generalNumber can be the same as singularNumber for some nouns, but the same as pluralNumber for other nouns. For example, in Arbore (arv), generalNumber may contrast with the singular in the absence of a distinct plural form: Ln Singular Ln tiis-in 'a maize cob' Ln lasa-n 'a loaf'
nebel-in 'a cock ostrich' ln General ln tíise 'maize cob(s)' ln lássa 'bread' ln nebel 'ostrich(es)' ln [Corbett 2000: 17-18]
| Properties | Values | Definition |
The meaning of pluralNumber naturally varies according to the system in which it is embedded. It can potentially mean 'more than two' or 'more than three' in languages where a dualNumber, trialNumber, paucalNumber, or other value is also present in the number system. No distinction among these narrower meanings is made within GOLD. Ln On terminology: the concept plural is occasionally called 'multiple' in descriptions of languages which have a paucalNumber, e.g. Fijian. On terminology: Under a minimal/augmented and minimal/unit-augmented systems, the label 'augmented' will map to the concept pluralNumber. Ln A note on minimal/augmented systems (and also minimal/unit-augmented/augmented). In some languages which have an inclusive/exclusive distinction in the first person, the firstPersonInclusive may use the morphology which otherwise expresses singularNumber, even though the semantics of firstPersonInclusive entail that it cannot be singular. There is an analysis of this in which the morphology is seen as representing the minimal number associated with the particular person value. Under such a system, the label 'minimal' can be mapped onto the concept singularNumber, except if one is dealing with firstPersonInclusive minimal, which would be mapped onto the concept dualNumber [Corbett 2000; Hayward 1984: 159-83] (incomplete). Ln There is an important theoretical question about whether minimal/unit-augmented/augmented should be considered separate concepts in the GOLD ontology. The main argument for this is that under such systems, the number values dual and trial are expressed only on the firstPersonInclusive by using the morphology otherwise associated with singular and dual respectively. However, as it is possible to specify a mapping from one system onto the other, we allow for a COPE to deal with this substantive issue while ensuring interoperability.